 |
This article is incomplete. (April 2013) |
| Sultanate of Bengal | |||||
| বাংলা সুলতানাত | |||||
| Sultanate | |||||
|
|||||
 The Sultanate of Bengal in 1500, including Bengal and parts of Bihar, Assam and Arakan
|
|||||
| Capital | Gaur, Pandua, Sonargaon | ||||
| Languages | Persian, Bengali and Arabic | ||||
| Religion | Sunni Islam (official), Hinduism, Buddhism | ||||
| Government | Monarchy | ||||
| Sultan | |||||
| • | 1342-1358 | Ilyas Shah (first) | |||
| • | 1572-1576 | Daud Khan Karrani (last) | |||
| Historical era | Late medieval | ||||
| • | Establishment | 1342 | |||
| • | Battle of Raj Mahal | 1576 | |||
| Currency | Tanka | ||||
| Today part of |  Bangladesh Burma India |
||||
|
Part of a series on the
|
|---|
| History of Bangladesh |
.jpg) |
|
Ancient
|
|
Classical
|
|
Medieval
|
|
Modern
|
|
Related articles
|
The Bengal Sultanate refers to an independent medieval Islamic state established in Bengal in 1342. Its realm and influence extended across modern-day Bangladesh, East India and West Burma. Several dynasties ruled over Bengal Sultanate sequentially. It disintegrated at the end of the 16th-century and was absorbed into the pan-South Asian Mughal Empire and the Arakanese Kingdom of Mrauk U.
The Sixty Dome Mosque in Bagerhat is a UNESCO World Heritage Site
Silver tanka of Jalaluddin Muhammad Shah
.jpg)
The Sona Mosque in Rajshahi
The Firoz Minar at Gaur
The pet giraffe of Saifuddin Hamza Shah, which was gifted to the Yongle Emperor of China as part of the growing relations between the sultanate and the Ming Dynasty.
.jpg)
HistoryEdit
See also: History of Bengal
Delhi lost its hold over Bengal in 1338, thus paving the way for the assumption of independence by Ilyas Khan."[1] In 1342, a local warlord, Shamsuddin Ilyas Shah proclaimed himself as monarch of the Kingdom of Lakhnauti. He would go on to consolidate his rule by conquering the other independent kingdoms of Bengal before proclaiming himself as Sultan of Bengal.
The absorption of Bengal into the Mughal Empire was a gradual process beginning with the defeat of Bengali forces under Sultan Nasiruddin Nasrat Shah by Babur at the Battle of Ghaghra and ending with the Battle of Raj Mahal where the Pashtun Karrani dynasty, the last reigning Sultans of Bengal were defeated.
List of SultansEdit
Ilyas Shahi dynasty (1342-1414)Edit
Main article: Ilyas Shahi dynasty
| Name | Reign | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Shamsuddin Ilyas Shah | 1342–1358 | Became the first sole ruler of whole Bengal comprising Sonargaon, Satgaon and Lakhnauti. |
| Sikandar Shah | 1358–1390 | Assassinated by his son and successor, Ghiyasuddin Azam Shah |
| Ghiyasuddin Azam Shah | 1390–1411 | |
| Saifuddin Hamza Shah | 1411–1413 | |
| Muhammad Shah bin Hamza Shah | 1413 | Assassinated by his father's slave Shihabuddin Bayazid Shah on the orders of the landlord of Dinajpur, Raja Ganesha |
| Shihabuddin Bayazid Shah | 1413–1414 | |
| Alauddin Firuz Shah I | 1414 | Son of Shihabuddin Bayazid Shah. Assassinated by Raja Ganesha |
House of Raja Ganesha (1414-1435)Edit
| Name | Reign | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raja Ganesha | 1414–1415 | |
| Jalaluddin Muhammad Shah | 1415–1416 | Son of Raja Ganesha and converted into Islam |
| Raja Ganesha | 1416–1418 | Second Phase |
| Jalaluddin Muhammad Shah | 1418–1433 | Second Phase |
| Shamsuddin Ahmad Shah | 1433–1435 |
Restored Ilyas Shahi dynasty (1435-1487)Edit
| Name | Reign | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Nasiruddin Mahmud Shah | 1435–1459 | |
| Rukunuddin Barbak Shah | 1459–1474 | |
| Shamsuddin Yusuf Shah | 1474–1481 | |
| Sikandar Shah II | 1481 | |
| Jalaluddin Fateh Shah | 1481–1487 |
Habshi rule (1487-1494)Edit
| Name | Reign | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Shahzada Barbak | 1487 | |
| Saifuddin Firuz Shah | 1487–1489 | |
| Mahmud Shah II | 1489–1490 | |
| Shamsuddin Muzaffar Shah | 1490–1494 |
Hussain Shahi dynasty (1494-1538)Edit
Main article: Hussain Shahi dynasty
| Name | Reign | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Alauddin Hussain Shah | 1494–1518 | |
| Nasiruddin Nasrat Shah | 1518–1533 | |
| Alauddin Firuz Shah II | 1533 | |
| Ghiyasuddin Mahmud Shah | 1533–1538 |
Governors under Suri rule (1539-1554)Edit
| Name | Reign | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Khidr Khan | 1539–1541 | Declared independence in 1541 and was replaced |
| Qazi Fazilat | 1541–1545 | |
| Muhammad Khan Sur | 1545–1554 | Declared independence upon the death of Islam Shah Suri |
Muhammad Shah dynasty (1554-1564)Edit
| Name | Reign | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Muhammad Khan Sur | 1554–1555 | Declared independence and styled himself as Shamsuddin Muhammad Shah |
| Ghiyasuddin Bahadur Shah II | 1555–1561 | |
| Ghiyasuddin Jalal Shah | 1561–1564 | |
| Ghiyasuddin Bahadur Shah III | 1564 |
Karrani dynasty (1564-1576)Edit
Main article: Karrani dynasty
| Name | Reign | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Taj Khan Karrani | 1564–1566 | |
| Sulaiman Khan Karrani | 1566–1572 | |
| Bayazid Khan Karrani | 1572 | |
| Daud Khan Karrani | 1572–1576 |
Mint townsEdit
![[icon]](/w/index.php?title=Special:ZeroRatedMobileAccess&from=Bengal_Sultanate&to=/wiki/File:Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg){kind=small} |
This section requires expansion. (April 2013) |
EconomyEdit
|
This section requires expansion. (April 2013) |
CultureEdit
|
This section requires expansion. (May 2013) |
Foreign relationsEdit
|
This section requires expansion. (April 2013) |
See alsoEdit
 |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Sultanate of Bengal. |
ReferencesEdit
- ^ Sen, Sailendra (2013). A Textbook of Medieval Indian History. Primus Books. pp. 120–121. ISBN 978-9-38060-734-4.
- The Bengal Sultanate: Politics, Economy and Coins, A.D. 1205-1576, Syed Ejaz Hussain (2003)
- The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, Richard M. Eaton (1996)
- Sultans and Mosques: The Early Muslim Architecture of Bangladesh, Perween Hasan (2007)
- Between Integration and Secession: The Muslim Communities of the South Philippines, Southern Thailand and Western Burma/Myanmar, Moshe Yegar (2002), Part One: The Muslims of Arakan
- The Grammar of Sultanate Mosque in Bengal Architecture, Nujaba Binte Kabir (2012)
®- Mobile
- Desktop
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Ayam e Jahiliya of Bangla, or " Bangla r Jahiliya "
ReplyDelete4th Jahliya of Bangla.
After the first in Suba Bangla two in British Bangla.
Fitna of Sex then Job then lands and now Power.
Holding the throat of opposition and Genius.
Nine years celebration starts from last year of last term of BNP formed Govt.
Strange silence and cooperation jointly
"Jamat e Tahiri Zakiri awali majlishi".
ReplyDeleteWhy immigrants are blessing and along the question do born in earth , right on move.
Why immigrants are conspired by enemy states.
They give anti state ideas, give miserable relations, all sorts of ill issues.
Even immigrants or domiciled or married to are also regrets by enemy intelligence, even breaking their marital relations.
We see in crisis time state authority contacts their foreign settlers that GCC
Like us, and manipulate issues in their country, like job , security issue, marital issue, business query, servilances,
One of the most negligence by the Bangladesh and familiar states to local immigrants lifes.
Are the conspired
Are you mismind of an weapon for international matters.
What foreigners in local relations do for the state they migrants.
ReplyDeleteIf they have friends, colegue, relative, ex relations, out side other countries even in their own birth lands, they contact for the state authorised agencies and influence national interest.
So why not enemy agency will take them back home or their country.
ReplyDelete-
Division and differences with nations.
In the advent of the industrial revolution and rise of British Royal Imperial Navy,
We see world wide Racial change integrations.
The benefit of such is nothing but to check the rise of unified force against British empire.
Thought out and founds fact as well that Muslim centers in pre European renesa and indutrialistion impractical without them.
Question rises was they conspired or test ground by their over curious moderators. Coz its heard that Muslim rulers were going through such change with own nation those are selected, and gone to secret places.
Such secret operations were later hands lover to illusions of strange and pathetic defeat of muslim ruler gradually.
Its strange why they leave such ruling of take caring structure.
Is this such you can not longer or decided to defeat.
Now Question is how British and western scholars made this thing possible for their formations of industrial civilizations in their forms,
In formations dragged by students of Europe who comes to Muslim country to study also engaged in shifting of centers for study and research, but this taken oath to them, why you here, what you will do in your country back, how to guide others, how to remain good to your religion ( Muslim accepted Christian and Judaic faith over church and sects ).
So they don't have any limitation to learn and collect but need permissions for that other wise it may become the part of course of ancient saint, may babilonian curse, that one day it may come to you for justice.
But it not family sentimentality rather Muslims observe them meet them, and also help them doing their dream to , but not conspiracies against them, then think goes to secret agencies, and their guardians ship towards all human suspends by its nature, its not good for anyone.
Coz they secretly exist among you with the commands they carry with them.
Its your goodness in supporting such Guardians ruler or Guiders world wide specially from once world greatest military powers and highly enrich academia.
If we concentrate to British empirical arrangements for colonization in Asia and Africa.
What happens to Scandinavians Greenland and Alaska populations.
Were they militerized and actually totally evacuated to Asia and north and scout Africa.
But how its know that British used north sea and pacific roots to drive naval fleets to Asia and they also reach Mexicans coasts as well.
They try to conquered the far east regions of Asia and fail but tried after taking south Asia africa and finally middle east.
They used that root one way, and the Arab madeterian, returns to Britain's.
What they did is athonic mix to strategical places, so we see new gene of races in sought Asia Oceania indo-china.
And cost of medeterians and south and south cost of Africa.
A migration taking place till now fro this reasons to Britain and its provincial countries world wide.
Do atomic Change or mixing is still can be a conspiracy to work with.
Or truth should be reveled for secure future.
ReplyDeleteFor the people and the freedom of choice and economy under well strictures Faith and legal codes of conduct.
For this a good cooperation from the State Authority, Good smart on-time Guardians and Patrons.
The other body of study human behavior growth devotions to faith is independent and part of state.
Its an welfare state from Patrons and patrons too welfare to them selfs and traditions.
Satern rising in name atheism.
ReplyDeleteBy by the way afro battlers in south Asia is highly to scrutiny.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDelete-
Internal purchase of close people of Muslim rulers or sending trained people to them even in far east reasons king People, took place.
But it is claimed that teachings of Far east Asia specially in Japanese orders rooted in ancient time of Arabia, when people come from there or contacted to the Companions or messengers to the prophet of Mecca, and its claimed now their teaching is found true Islamic thoughts and action course.
It claimed from sources of the Japanese intervention in indo-Bangla war specially had taken cares, though Japanese took Netaji corordially and sent to German but actually the didn't take his post colonial Indo-Bangla and Burma-Bangla political and ritual forms.
And what ever assurance given to netazi for such, but actually seemt he is not satisfied or in confusions, perhaps his tendency was a participation with German Japan and British american to let Appear the Post Mugolistan to its true form with capital in Chittagong and manage Calcutta for final shift in Dhaka.
Sri Dhaka oath completion and rise of world power of Bangla.
Its also claimed a trail of ancestors of Japan is rooted in Bangla.
Is it that Japanese are pair Turk nation evolve from riverine valleys of south and south east Asia, a tribe from Bangla among others.
ReplyDeleteA turn of ancient gulas that sea conqourer people of cost and rivers of grians lands and fish sea, to dry reasons of Egypt, Kenan, and then present turkey and around the black sea, and then towards mid Asia until ferocious chase by sand warriors and then finally gethering in dry reasons of mid Asia and finally mixed with whether protohumans tribe or upper kokesian tribes.
Are they the ancient turn for turks for turk Genrations to mid Asia specially Tatars and reasons mixed with kokesians around black and Caspian sea and upper kokesia.